Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSandoval-Olaya, Paul
dc.contributor.authorCórdova-Pintado, Manuel J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-16T15:44:58Z
dc.date.available2025-10-16T15:44:58Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-06
dc.identifier.citationSandoval-Olaya, P., & Córdova-Pintado, M. J. (2024). Gestión del Estado y Abastecimiento de Equipos Protección al Personal de Salud durante la Pandemia COVID-19, a partir de la experiencia de Sullana 2023. Espacio Abierto, 33(1), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10664126en_US
dc.identifier.govdocpp 199202ZU44
dc.identifier.govdocPPI201502ZU4636
dc.identifier.issn1315-0006
dc.identifier.issn2477-9601
dc.identifier.otherDOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10664126
dc.identifier.urihttp://bdigital2.ula.ve:8080/xmlui/654321/21495
dc.description.abstractEl alto índice de morbilidad y mortalidad causada por la COVID-19 generó que los gobiernos realicen gestión para el abastecimiento de equipos de protección personal con el propósito de proteger de contagio a trabajadores sanitarios, principalmente al personal de salud que atiende directamente a pacientes infectados. Sin embargo, la política no es consistente cuando se contrasta lo formulado con su implementación. El objetivo de la investigación realizada fue determinar la gestión del Estado y abastecimiento de equipos protección al personal de salud durante la pandemia COVID-19. La investigación es con enfoque cuantitativo, de diseño; no experimental de corte transversal, descriptivo correlacional. Se utilizó la técnica de encuesta con un cuestionario en línea. El resultado es que la gestión del Estado es deficiente con respecto al abastecimiento de los equipos de protección personal, además de que ha sido inadecuada en 40,7 %, resaltando el 15,7 % de nivel bajo, seguido del 14,4 % nivel muy bajo en el nivel abastecimiento general. La conclusión es que la gestión, expresada en una correlación positiva alta con el abastecimiento de equipos protectores (con un nivel de significancia del 0,000 menor 0,01), muestra una evolución basada más en la gestión de la política que del diseño, de modo que al aumentar acciones de gestión situacional, aumentó progresivamente el abastecimiento.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe high rate of morbidity and mortality caused by COVID-19 caused governments to manage the supply of personal protective equipment with the purpose of protecting health workers from contagion, mainly health personnel who directly care for infected patients. However, the policy is not consistent between and its implementation. The objective of the research carried out was to determine the State’s management and supply of protective equipment to health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research is with a quantitative, design approach; non-experimental cross-sectional, descriptive correlational. The survey technique was used with an online questionnaire. The result is that the State’s management is deficient with respect to the supply of personal protective equipment, in addition to being inadequate in 40.7%, highlighting the 15.7% low level, followed by the 14.4% level very low in the general supply level. The conclusion is that management, expressed in a high positive correlation with the supply of Management, expressed in a high positive improvement with the supply of protective equipment (with a significance level of 0.000 less than 0.01), shows an evolution based more on policy management than design, so that, at increasing situational management actions, supply progressively increased.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe high rate of morbidity and mortality caused by COVID-19 caused governments to manage the supply of personal protective equipment with the purpose of protecting health workers from contagion, mainly health personnel who directly care for infected patients. However, the policy is not consistent between and its implementation. The objective of the research carried out was to determine the State’s management and supply of protective equipment to health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research is with a quantitative, design approach; non-experimental cross-sectional, descriptive correlational. The survey technique was used with an online questionnaire. The result is that the State’s management is deficient with respect to the supply of personal protective equipment, in addition to being inadequate in 40.7%, highlighting the 15.7% low level, followed by the 14.4% level very low in the general supply level. The conclusion is that management, expressed in a high positive correlation with the supply of Management, expressed in a high positive improvement with the supply of protective equipment (with a significance level of 0.000 less than 0.01), shows an evolution based more on policy management than design, so that, at increasing situational management actions, supply progressively increased.en_US
dc.language.isoesen_US
dc.publisherUniversidad del Zuliaen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ve/en_US
dc.subjectEquipo de Protección Personalen_US
dc.subjectCOVID 19en_US
dc.subjectGestiónen_US
dc.subjectImplementación de políticas sanitariasen_US
dc.subjectPersonal Protective Equipmenten_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectImplementation of Health Policiesen_US
dc.titleGestión del estado y abastecimiento de equipos protección al personal de salud durante la pandemia COVID-19, a partir de la experiencia de Sullana 2023en_US
dc.title.alternativeState management and supply of protective equipment for health personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic, from Sullana experience in 2023en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ve/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ve/