Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Uso y percepción de la inteligencia artificial en las facultades de agricultura de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
| dc.contributor.author | Talamantes Castorena, Ismael | |
| dc.contributor.author | Dominguez Dominguez, Rita I. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Talamantes Castorena, Saulo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Castorena, Aracely T. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Rosas Meza, Nidia I. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-28T15:04:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-28T15:04:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-17 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0798-1015 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2739-0071 | |
| dc.identifier.other | https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a25v46n06p08 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://bdigital2.ula.ve:8080/xmlui/654321/23478 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Se describe el uso y las percepciones de la inteligencia artíficial (IA) en estudiantes de tres facultades agrícolas de la Univeridad Autónoma de Sinaloa, México, mediante estudio cuantitativo, transversal y no experimental (n=820), con cuestionario de 30 ítems (Likert; α=0.797) y correlaciones de Spearman. Siete de cada diez usan IA, principalmente ChatGPT (56.16%). Beneficios reportados: ahorro de tiempo (31.96%), retención (27.17%) y personalización (22.61%). La efectividad percibida se asocia con promedio (ρ=0.713) y mejora atribuida (ρ=0.708). El 79.86% carece de capacitación. Se propone integración curricular, formación ética y lineamientos institucionales | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This study describes AI use and perceptions among students from three agricultural faculties using a quantitative, cross-sectional, non-experimental design (n=820), a 30-item Likert questionnaire (α=0.797), and Spearman correlations. Seven out of ten students use AI, mainly ChatGPT (56.16%). Reported benefits include time savings (31.96%), improved retention (27.17%), and personalization (22.61%). Perceived effectiveness is associated with grade average (ρ=0.713) and AI-attributed grade improvement (ρ=0.708). Overall, 79.86% lack training. Curricular integration, ethics-focused training, and institutional guidelines are recommended. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | es | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Grupo Editorial Espacios GEES 2021 C.A. | en_US |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ve/ | en_US |
| dc.subject | inteligencia artificial | en_US |
| dc.subject | educación superior | en_US |
| dc.subject | chatgpt | en_US |
| dc.subject | rendimiento académico | en_US |
| dc.subject | artificial intelligence | en_US |
| dc.subject | higher education | en_US |
| dc.subject | chatgpt | en_US |
| dc.subject | academic performance | en_US |
| dc.title | Uso y percepción de la inteligencia artificial en las facultades de agricultura de la Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa | en_US |
| dc.title.alternative | Use and perception of artificial intelligence in the agricultural faculties of the Autonomous University of Sinaloa | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
